கணினித்துறையில் தமிழர்கள் பலர் இருந்தும் அதிலும் குறிப்பாக Microsoft நிறுவனத்தில் தமிழர்களின் ஆதிக்கம் அதிகமிருந்தும் இதுவரை கூகிள் தமிழில் மொழிபெயர்ப்பு வெளியிடாமல் இருந்தது ஆச்சிரியமாகவே இருந்தது, அந்தக்குறையை கூகிள் நிறுவனம் இன்று பூர்த்தி செய்துள்ளது.
ஆங்கிலம், அரபி, ஹிந்தி, உருது போன்ற பல மொழிகளில் உள்ள வலைத்தளங்கள், மற்றும் செய்திகளை ஒரே கிளிக்கில் தெரிந்து கொள்ள இது ஏதுவாக அமையும்.
Dear Graduate & Diploma friends,Assalaamu Alikum (warah) Kindly register your name in Taluk office to vote Graduate constituency(Tiruchi) and also Teacher constituency. along application show the originalDegree certificate, residential proof (ration card Xerox, driving license Xerox)Enroll female vote also. Need not ...go to poling booth station. Vote is in our hand. Remember it. Attention to all our educated people.Pass it on to all Jamth.Inform in Jumma assembling time. Last date :6 November. Ever in your service,Kudanthai Prof. Tamil maamani. Dr. Haji.M.A.Mohamed Hussain.Founder : Al Kareem Foundation,Research consultant:Socio Islamic Secular Research Center[SISERC]Kumbakonam.
All NRI pls read carefully, if you stay in India for 60 days plus in a year, you are not considered an NRI under the new Income Tax rules. You will be taxed as any other local tax payers. The IT rule is appended at the end of the circular.
NEW INDIAN RULES FOR TAXATION FROM APRIL/2010 - AN NRI IS NOT CONSIDERED AS NRI IF HE COMES TO INDIA FOR 60 DAYS & MORE IN A YEAR BUT WILL BE TAXED ON HIS ALL THE INCOME THE PERSON HAS EARNED IN THE FOREIGN COUNTY DURING THE YEAR.
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER THE PERSON HAS LIVED OUTSIDE INDIA FOR DECADES. THIS MEANS FROM NOW ON, IF AN NRI GOES TO INDIA EVEN FOR A FEW TRIPS AND THAT CUMULATES TO OVER 60 DAYS IN THE YEAR, WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A LOCAL CITIZEN AND WILL HAVE TO DECLARE HIS FOREIGN INCOME AND PAY TAX ON IT.
THEREFORE, HENCEFORTH GOING TO OUR OWN COUNTRY, WE WILL HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GO ONLY IN AN EMERGENCY BUT NOT TO MEET RELATIVES; NEITHER FOR A SOCIAL TRIP NOR FOR LONG MEDICAL CHECKUPS NRIs SHOULD NOW HAVE TO GET THEIR CHILDREN MARRIED IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND HOLD ALL THE OTHER CELEBRATIONS WITH CLOSE RELATIVES OUTSIDE INDIA. IT IS CHEAPER TO BUY TICKETS FOR CLOSE RELATIVES TO PARTICIPATE IN OUR CHILDRENS’ WEDDINGS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES
IMPORTANT NEWS FOR NRIs! NOW THAT THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT DOES NOT REQUIRE NRI’S FOREIGN EXCHANGE, WE WILL NOW BECOME NOT REQUIRED INDIANS. PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO ALL YOUR NRI FRIENDS IN YOUR FORWARD LIST.
THE NEW CLAUSE
UNDER CLAUSE 4 OF THE DIRECT TAXES CODE, WHICH IS TO COME INTO EFFECT FROM 1ST APRIL 2012, THE STATUS OF RESIDENT BUT NOT ORDINARILY RESIDENT, WHICH IS CURRENTLY AVAIALABLE UNDER SECTION 6 (6) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT OF 1961, IS SOUGHT TO BE REMOVED.
AFTER THE CODE COMES INTO FORCE, A PERSON WILL BECOME RESIDENT IN INDIA IN ANY FINANCIAL YEAR IF EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING TWO CONDITIONS IS FULFILLED:
A. IF HE IS IN INDIA FOR A PERIOD OR PERIODS REPEAT PERIODS AGGREGATING TO 182 DAYS OR MORE IN A FINANCIAL YEAR OR
B. IF HE IS IN INDIA FOR 60 DAYS OR MORE IN A FINANCIAL YEAR AND HAS ALSO BEEN IN INDIA FOR 365 DAYS OR MORE WITHIN THE FOUR YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THAT FINANCIAL YEAR.
C. THEREFORE, A NON RESIDENT INDIAN WOULD BECOME RESIDENT IN INDIA UNDER THE DIRECT TAX CODE IF EITHER OF THE AFORESAID TWO CONDITIONS IS FULFILLED, AND WILL BE LIABLE TO TAX IN INDIA ON HIS WORLD INCOME. THIS WOULD BE NOT WITHSTANDING THE FACT THE HE MAY BE A PERSON RESIDENT OUTSIDE INDIA UNDER THE PROVISTIONS OF THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT 1999.
1. The disputed structure was constructed as mosque by or under orders of Babar. 2. It is not proved by direct evidence that premises in dispute including constructed portion belonged to Babar or the person who constructed the mosque or under whose orders it was constructed. 3. No temple was demolished for constructing the mosque. 4. Mosque was constructed over the ruins of temples which were lying in utter ruins since a very long time before the construction of mosque and some material thereof was used in construction of the mosque. 5. That for a very long time till the construction of the mosque it was treated/ believed by Hindus that some where in a very large area of which premises in dispute is a very small part birth place of Lord Ram was situated, however, the belief did not relate to any specified small area within that bigger area specifically the premises in dispute.
6. That after some time of construction of the mosque Hindus started identifying the premises in dispute as exact birth place of Lord Ram or a place wherein exact birth place was situated. 7. That much before 1855 Ram Chabutra and Seeta Rasoi had come into existence and Hindus were worshipping in the same. It was very very unique and absolutely unprecedented situation that in side the boundary wall and compound of the mosque Hindu religious places were there which were actually being worshipped along with offerings of Namaz by Muslims in the mosque. 8. That in view of the above gist of the finding at serial no.7 both the parties Muslims as well as Hindus are held to be in joint possession of the entire premises in dispute. 9. That even though for the sake of convenience both the parties i.e. Muslims and Hindus were using and occupying different portions of the premises in dispute still it did not amount to formal partition and both continued to be in joint possession of the entire premises in dispute. 10. That both the parties have failed to prove commencement of their title hence by virtue of Section 110 Evidence Act both are held to be joint title holders on the basis of joint possession. 11. That for some decades before 1949 Hindus started treating/believing the place beneath the Central dome of mosque (where at present make sift temple stands) to be exact birth place of Lord Ram. 12. That idol was placed for the first time beneath the Central dome of the mosque in the early hours of 23.12.1949. 13. That in view of the above both the parties are declared to be joint title holders in possession of the entire premises in dispute and a preliminary decree to that effect is passed with the condition that at the time of actual partition by meets and bounds at the stage of preparation of final decree the portion beneath the Central dome where at present make sift temple stands will be allotted to the share of the Hindus.
Order:-Accordingly, all the three sets of parties, i.e. Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi
Akhara are declared joint title holders of the property/ premises in dispute as described by letters A B C D E F in the map Plan-I prepared by Sri Shiv Shanker Lal, Pleader/ Commissioner appointed by Court in Suit No.1 to the extent of one third share each for using and managing the same for worshipping. A preliminary decree to this effect is passed. However, it is further declared that the portion below the central dome where at present the idol is kept in makeshift temple will be allotted to Hindus in final decree. It is further directed that Nirmohi Akhara will be allotted share including that part which is shown by the words Ram Chabutra and Sita Rasoi in the said map.
It is further clarified that even though all the three parties are declared to have one third share each, however if while allotting exact portions some minor adjustment in the share is to be made then the same will be made and the adversely affected party may be compensated by allotting some portion of the adjoining land which has been acquired by the Central Government.
The parties are at liberty to file their suggestions for actual partition by metes and bounds within three months.
List immediately after filing of any suggestion/ application for preparation of final decree after obtaining necessary instructions from Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Status quo as prevailing till date pursuant to Supreme Court judgment of Ismail Farooqui (1994(6) Sec 360) in all its minutest details shall be maintained for a period of three months unless this order is modified or vacated earlier.
GIST OF THE FINDINGS by JUSTICE. DHARAM VEER SHARMA
ISSUES FOR BRIEFING 1. Whether the disputed site is the birth place of Bhagwan Ram?
The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Ram. Place of birth is a juristic person and is a deity. It is personified as the spirit of divine worshipped as birth place of Lord Rama as a child. Spirit of divine ever remains present every where at all times for any one to invoke at any shape or form in accordance with his own aspirations and it can be shapeless and formless also.
2. Whether the disputed building was a mosque? When was it built? By whom?The disputed building was constructed by Babar, the year is not certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus, it cannot have the character of a mosque.
3. Whether the mosque was built after demolishing a Hindu temple?The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old structure after demolition of the same. The Archaeological Survey of India has proved that the structure was a massive Hindu religious structure.
4. Whether the idols were placed in the building on the night of December 22/23rd, 1949?The idols were placed in the middle dome of the disputed structure in the intervening night of 22/23.12.1949.
5. Whether any of the claims for title is time barred?O.O.S. No. 4 of 1989, the Sunni Central Board of Waqfs U.P., Lucknow and others Vs. Gopal Singh Visharad and others and O.O.S. No.3 of 1989, Nirmohi Akhara and Another Vs. Sri Jamuna Prasad Singh and others are barred by time.
6. What will be the status of the disputed site e.g. inner and outer courtyard?It is established that the property in suit is the site of Janm Bhumi of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general had the right to worship Charan, Sita Rasoi, other idols and other object of worship existed upon the property in suit. It is also established that Hindus have been worshipping the place in dispute as Janm Sthan i.e. a birth place as deity and visiting it as a sacred place of pilgrimage as of right since time immemorial. After the construction of thedisputed structure it is proved the deities were installed inside the disputed structure on 22/23.12.1949. It is also proved that the outer courtyard was in exclusive possession of Hindus and they were worshipping throughout and in the inner courtyard (in the disputed structure) they were also worshipping. It is also established that the disputed structure cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets of Islam. Thanks regards: posted by: jeeva giridharan
The world is full of barriers - political, cultural and ideological. Barriers are products of distrust and Distrust is a result of lack of understanding. Barriers drop when we get to know each other, when we are able to reach into each other's world. But to make acquaintances, break the ice - and in the long run build trust, there is need for communication.
Hams have always been at the forefront of technology. Radio Amateurs have had the privilege of global communication for a long time. We have been citizens of the world ever since Amateur Radio came about. It is our legacy to the world that we are the pioneers in bringing people together. Amateur Radio serves the community by providing communications during Emergencies and Natural Disasters.
I had always liked to make friends - everywhere. I come across the Amateur Radio,, and discovered it is a good way to make friends. I talk to people in the remotest parts of the world and exchange messages with other Ham friends. I have made friends in all corners of the globe. I have been on air since 13 Dec 1994. I am active on almost all the bands on 40M, 20M, 15M, 10M & VHF.
I have participated in the 24th International SEANET(South East Asia Amateur Radio Network) convention held in 1996 at Madras and I had also participated in All India HAMFESTin 1997 at Cochin , in 1998 at Bangalore, in 1999 at Mysore, in 2000 at Hyderabad, in 2002 at Chennai, in 2006 at Kollam and in 2009 at Bengaluru.
Information Regarding My Shack
Radio HF
Yaesu FT 840 (HF Base)
Radio VHF
Yaesu FT 2400H and Yaesu FT 10R (VHF Handheld)
Bands
40, 20, 10, 15, 2 Meters
Antenna (HF)
Diamond Multi Band (80, 40, 20, 10, 15 & 6 Meters)-
vertical (CP-6) Antenna
Homebrew Dual Band (40 & 20 M) Dipole Antenna
Antenna (2M)
Vertical (Slimjim) Antenna
Antenna Height
All Antennas are 60ft above the ground level
Antenna Tuner
Yaesu FC 700 Manual Antenna Tuner
Antenna Rotator
Channel Master Antenna Rotator for V.H.F Beam Antenna
SWR Meter
Diamond SX-200 SWR & Power Meter
Power Supply
Diamond GSV3000 Power Supply for HF / VHF
Coax Antenna Switch
MFJ - 1702B Two Position Coaxial Switch for HF
Computer System
Pentium IV / 3.6 GHz Processor / 512 MB RAM
17" Digital Colour Monitor & ADSL Internet Modem
HF & VHF Contesting
DXing on HF / VHF (Looking for new country)
Particpating Hamfest and Club Meeting
Here you see amateur radio operators doing what they enjoy most, making contacts with other radio amateurs around the world. I have worked 170 countries on SSB (10m / 15m / 20m / 40m band) - out of which 134 countries is confirmed. My first DX QSO (Foreign contact) with OM. Nick (RV6 BW) from Russia on 2nd December 1996.
I have sent QSL Card (Acknowledgement Card) to all my contacts. I received first QSL card from OM. Tex (9M2 TO) from Malaysia.
On June 17, 2003, I achieved one of my long-cherished goals - when the American Radio Relay League admitted me to the DX Century Club and gave the DXCC Award. This accomplishment signifies 'confirmed (QSL Cards) contacts' in at least 100 entities on the ARRL DXCC List. There are 335 current entities on the ARRL DXCC list. Contacts with at least 326 current entities are required to enter the DXCC Honor Roll. I am presently working to achieve this. Also view my otherAmateur Radio Awards.
